Paint it Red

There’s a key difference between laboring to realize a handful of food and working to realize a fistful of money with which to buy food. The latter involves an additional step. 

Certain human entities have artfully inserted themselves, acting as intermediaries, drawing a curtain between individuals and nature (what individuals need to survive). Hence, one’s loyalty is towards these intercessors, relegating nature to the sidelines.

On the surface, this design for living seems marvelous. Indeed, the toil of producing necessities has decreased and leisure time has increased. Again, we see a surplus in frills and novelties for purchase to further amuse ourselves.

There is an axiom to consider: Visible principles over invisible purposes. The prevailing rules, or codes of conduct governing society, usher in conformity to the whims of human architects. Do what, when, how, by order. Subservient to those controlling the flow of precious money. Indeed, a top-down structure reminiscent of a pyramid.

Confronted with this reality, most simply say it is by chance. A remnant, however, maintains it is by design. The majority just follows, while a minority possesses more of a leadership mentality.

Leastwise, nature has no need of money, nor harbors a yen to exert control over the masses. By hunting and gathering, one serves oneself. By working for money, one serves others. And the latter people’s delight. Slapping themselves on the back, strutting around with immense pride in having performed adequately for their human masters.

Sinful humans will do anything (no matter how absurd) under the rule of mankind (no matter how corrupt), while steadfastly resisting God’s design through nature. In the United States, the leadership stands implicated in being intimately involved over decades with J.E. and G.M. et al. However, the public moves forward in fatal optimism.

A litany of “red flags” paints an ever ominous-looking sky. And so it is.

Leave a comment