Societies must resist evil. Quite right. However, there are times citizens must undergo chastisement. As regards the latter, surrender is the only option which seems contrary. How does one draw distinction? The prophet Jeremiah proclaimed individuals should give themselves over to the Babylonians to survive. Those that fled to another land, or fought, lost their lives as Jeremiah foretold. Do commonwealths surmise chastisement is come? At first, punishment was the loss of sovereignty.
Social orders have surrendered. Only many people don’t fathom this. The case of the objectors in Canada is a prime illustration. A person’s livelihood now depends on delegates who may leverage one’s shares on impulse. The perception we are up to date—even on par regarding knowledge with our handlers—is absurd!
So, surrender is not an option any longer, for commonalities have casually embraced it. The contention is whether to comply with subsidiary mandates. Controllers have advanced preparations concerning all parties. What remains is for individuals to betray themselves. Controllers stimulate this effort via media channels. For instance, those who presume they are at leisure to express their sentiments on “X” are correct. However, the social media/networking service—as the clever brand symbolizes—marks those for the sword, pestilence, and famine. A remnant has also gone into captivity and suffers amid the chaos. “X” is a deliverer, not from, rather, to, the authoritarians for morrow vengeance. Anybody suggesting we may save this world is promulgating a deception.
Alas, the reluctance to accept sentence stems from personal pride. It is our Lord’s determination, and we are subjects. For all are guilty and thus, we shall suffer for our inequities. Lack of nuisance clouds our imaginations for to yield physically does not involve spiritual concession—a premier variation.
Certain entities proclaiming Christianity prompt upheavals through politics and spur disparate endeavors rooted in warped sensibilities regarding doctrine further shaped by 21st century ease. Of note, their impersonation of justice is a spectacle of failure to grasp their own inadequacy. Second, salvation unfolds individually. Therefore, to envisage Christian societies and nations is pure delusion, and such outcries are primeval.
Time’s elemental task is to tell us there is an end to it. When pressed for time, most individuals seek self-preservation; it is a mass entity that only sees, cares about itself, and tramples any who may get in the way. Leaders may exert pressure by caprice content in the knowledge masses will perform adequately. Those on the margins are at the mercy of their own kind, which is not mercy, but cruelty. Enter in the new age, but only for a season.
Anon's Register 